Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
J Robot Surg ; 16(6): 1383-1389, 2022 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35142979

RESUMEN

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols have been developed in several fields to reduce hospitalization lengths and overall costs. There have also been developments in multimodal analgesia methods to curtail opioid usage after surgery. Herein, we present the results of our initiation of an ERAS protocol for robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial and radical nephrectomies, employing a quadratus lumborum (QL) regional anesthetic block. We retrospectively reviewed 614 patients in our Institutional Review Board approved database who underwent robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial or radical nephrectomies from January 2017 to February 2020. An ERAS protocol utilizing multimodal analgesia (acetaminophen and gabapentin) and a QL block was developed and introduced in February 2019. We then compared the opioid consumption and perioperative outcomes of patients before and after ERAS protocol initiation. 192 ERAS patients (February 2019 to February 2020) were compared to 422 non-ERAS patients (January 2017 to January 2019). Baseline characteristics and the proportion of preoperative opioids users were similar between the two groups. There were no statistically significant differences in surgery length, hospitalization length, or complication rates. There were statistically significant differences in our primary endpoint, opioid consumption, on post-operative days 0 (p < 0.001), 1 (p < 0.001), and 2 (p < 0.001). The total opioid requirements over the course of admission were lower in the ERAS group compared to the non-ERAS group (p = 0.03). The initiation of an ERAS protocol employing multimodal analgesia and a QL block, for patients undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial or radical nephrectomies, can decrease opioid requirements without compromising perioperative outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Recuperación Mejorada Después de la Cirugía , Laparoscopía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Humanos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Gabapentina , Estudios Retrospectivos , Acetaminofén , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Tiempo de Internación , Laparoscopía/métodos , Nefrectomía , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología
2.
J Robot Surg ; 16(3): 715-721, 2022 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34431025

RESUMEN

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the impact of a multimodal Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol on perioperative opioid consumption and hospital length of stay (LOS) after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). We compared the first 176 patients enrolled in the protocol (ERAS group) with the previous 176 patients (non-ERAS group) at a single quaternary institution from December 2017 to June 2019. The ERAS protocol included a multimodal opioid-sparing regimen utilizing acetaminophen, gabapentin, celecoxib, and liposomal bupivacaine. Demographic data, co-morbidities, post-operative pain scores, post-operative opiate consumption measured by morphine milligram equivalents (MME), operating time, and LOS were collected. The two groups were compared using chi-squared, Fisher exact, or Student t tests as appropriate. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of prolonged LOS (> 1 day). The ERAS and non-ERAS groups were equivalent in terms of baseline characteristics and pathological data. The ERAS group had lower post-operative pain scores, post-operative opiate consumption (MME 15 vs. 46, p < 0.01), and LOS (1.2 vs. 1.7 days, p < 0.01) compared to the non-ERAS group. Only 22% in the ERAS cohort had a prolonged LOS compared to 39% of the non-ERAS group (p < 0.01). The ERAS protocol was a negative predictor of prolonged LOS on multivariable logistic regression analysis (odds ratio 0.39, 95% confidence interval 0.22-0.70, p < 0.01). A limitation of this study is its single-center retrospective design. The implementation of a multimodal opioid-sparing ERAS protocol was associated with improved pain control, reduced perioperative opioid usage, and shorter LOS after RARP.


Asunto(s)
Alcaloides Opiáceos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Prostatectomía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos
3.
Laryngoscope ; 131(3): E792-E799, 2021 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32516508

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: We implement a novel enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol with pre-operative non-opioid loading, total intravenous anesthesia, multimodal peri-operative analgesia, and restricted red blood cell (pRBC) transfusions. 1) Compare differences in mean postoperative peak pain scores, opioid usage, and pRBC transfusions. 2) Examine changes in overall length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit LOS, complications, and 30-day readmissions. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study comparing 132 ERAS vs. 66 non-ERAS patients after HNC tissue transfer reconstruction. Data was collected in a double-blind fashion by two teams. RESULTS: Mean postoperative peak pain scores were lower in the ERAS group up to postoperative day (POD) 2. POD0: 4.6 ± 3.6 vs. 6.5 ± 3.5; P = .004) (POD1: 5.2 ± 3.5 vs. 7.3 ± 2.3; P = .002) (POD2: 4.1 ± 3.5 vs. 6.6 ± 2.8; P = .000). Opioid utilization, converted into morphine milligram equivalents, was decreased in the ERAS group (POD0: 6.0 ± 9.8 vs. 10.3 ± 10.8; P = .010) (POD1: 14.1 ± 22.1 vs. 34.2 ± 23.2; P = .000) (POD2: 11.4 ± 19.7 vs. 37.6 ± 31.7; P = .000) (POD3: 13.7 ± 20.5 vs. 37.9 ± 42.3; P = .000) (POD4: 11.7 ± 17.9 vs. 36.2 ± 39.2; P = .000) (POD5: 10.3 ± 17.9 vs. 35.4 ± 45.6; P = .000). Mean pRBC transfusion rate was lower in ERAS patients (2.1 vs. 3.1 units, P = .017). There were no differences between ERAS and non-ERAS patients in hospital LOS, ICU LOS, complication rates, and 30-day readmissions. CONCLUSION: Our ERAS pathway reduced postoperative pain, opioid usage, and pRBC transfusions after HNC reconstruction. These benefits were obtained without an increase in hospital or ICU LOS, complications, or readmission rates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 131:E792-E799, 2021.


Asunto(s)
Recuperación Mejorada Después de la Cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Otorrinolaringológicos/rehabilitación , Atención Perioperativa/métodos , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/rehabilitación , Trasplante de Tejidos/rehabilitación , Anciano , Analgesia/métodos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Transfusión Sanguínea/estadística & datos numéricos , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Cabeza/cirugía , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cuello/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Otorrinolaringológicos/métodos , Manejo del Dolor/estadística & datos numéricos , Dimensión del Dolor/estadística & datos numéricos , Dolor Postoperatorio/epidemiología , Dolor Postoperatorio/terapia , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Colgajos Quirúrgicos , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 68(10): 2359-2364, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32748487

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Perioperative neurocognitive disorder (PND) is now recognized as the most common postoperative complication in older surgical patients. Current multidisciplinary guidelines recommend simple cognitive screening of older adults before surgery. Patients identified at risk should have input from an interprofessional team with expertise caring for older surgical patients. Data suggest these recommendations are infrequently met. We set out to test feasibility of routine cognitive screening in a busy preoperative assessment clinic and establish a perioperative pathway with multidisciplinary support for patients identified at risk. METHODS: We undertook a prospective quality improvement study. A cohort of 1,803 older surgical patients scheduled for preoperative evaluation was screened with the Mini-Cog© test. As the project developed, we began confirmatory neurocognitive testing by occupational therapists for those patients flagged at risk. Patients confirmed at risk were referred for further evaluation by a geriatrician and geriatric pharmacist. Alerts were developed to flag patients at risk through their in-patient journey, and a multidisciplinary team developed a comprehensive care pathway. RESULTS: We demonstrated that implementing routine cognitive screening can be done in a busy clinic, regardless of prior experience. The prevalence of preoperative cognitive impairment was 21% in our older patients undergoing inpatient surgery, rising to 36% in those older than 85 years. When the Mini-Cog results were not known to providers, they were unable to identify cognitive impairment in half of the patients, supporting the use of a validated screening test. We established an interprofessional team and pooled relevant recommendations into an age-friendly perioperative care pathway for patients at increased cognitive risk. CONCLUSION: Cognitive screening must be done to reliably identify older surgical patients at risk of PND. Demonstrating the prevalence of cognitive impairment in older surgical patients can provide impetus to develop a multidisciplinary team and care pathway with the aim of reducing the incidence of PNDs. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:2359-2364, 2020.


Asunto(s)
Disfunción Cognitiva/diagnóstico , Evaluación Geriátrica/métodos , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Atención Perioperativa/métodos , Cuidados Preoperatorios/métodos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Disfunción Cognitiva/epidemiología , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Implementación de Plan de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Pruebas de Estado Mental y Demencia , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Complicaciones Cognitivas Postoperatorias/etiología , Periodo Preoperatorio , Prevalencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Medición de Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA